Dark Creature Favortism?
Oct. 31st, 2006 07:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I apologize to those on my flist who are not into Harry Potter, but this is a poll I want to make available to those not necessarily on my friends list.
I have noticed that Vampires do not seem to be shunned in potterverse, like Werewolves. They have special candy for them, and apparently can be famous singers and invited to Christmas Parties in school (wherein they are followed by girl students.)
So - my poll:
[Poll #857657]
I have noticed that Vampires do not seem to be shunned in potterverse, like Werewolves. They have special candy for them, and apparently can be famous singers and invited to Christmas Parties in school (wherein they are followed by girl students.)
So - my poll:
[Poll #857657]
no subject
Date: 2006-11-01 06:51 pm (UTC)I also think vampires can be a bit more rational than werewolves could ever be in their animal form. Granted, wolfsbane is available, but as Lupin said, its a fairly recent development, and it doesn't sound as though its available to everybody. Lupin had to depend on Snape for his supply.
It may also be partly to do with the respective transformations themselves. By all accounts, the werewolf transformation is a grotesque experience, whereas with vampires, its usually just their teeth getting longer. And I think "barbed_whispers" made a good point about werewolves being animals. It sounds as though, without wolfsbane, werewolves on the full moon are really little more than animals.
Of course, with people like Fenrir Greyback running around preying on children, who can really blame the Wizarding community for favoring vampires over werewolves? Between Greyback and Bela Lugosi's Dracula, I know who I'd rather be around.