author_by_night: (Headdesk missandrony)
author_by_night ([personal profile] author_by_night) wrote2006-04-09 06:14 pm
Entry tags:

Guide to Sugar Quill

1. Yes, we are canon obsessed, and yes, we freely admit to being a bit opinionated on that time to time. There are brilliant sites wherein canon and fanon can be tossed together like a caesar salad; SQ isn't one of them.

2. Maybe the latter is annoying, but it's just as annoying for those of us who can't find a fic archive - other than SQ - that doesn't have more Draco porn and evilistehsexay fics than fics that I actually recognize as close to canon. We have a right to be canon based.

3. Would you go to a book club meeting and ask why they don't discuss movies?

/end rant

[identity profile] stmargarets.livejournal.com 2006-04-09 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yes, there's plenty of room for wank (what a hideously accurate word) within canon as well. Still, I think it's fine for the Quill (or any other site) to fight for its standards.

[identity profile] miss-sophia.livejournal.com 2006-04-09 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, absolutely. I couldn't agree more. I don't understand why someone would want to change things at the Quill (if that's what was going on...) when they could just go somewhere else and indulge in AU-ness, non-canon-ness, or whatever it is they wanted. There are many little corners of the Web. Go find yours and be happy. :)

Of course, this is the same argument I make to the Harmonians about why they shouldn't waste their breath arguing that H/Hr just might be canon after all. Just enjoy the fanon and be happy, man.

*le sigh*

[identity profile] author-by-night.livejournal.com 2006-04-09 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah... really. But some people dont get it.